Successful schools

After parenting two children and having taught fifteen-plus years, this is what I have learned. Children learn best in small classrooms.  Preferably, fifteen or less.

Second, principals need to support teachers. Students need discipline. A vice principal once told me that I was not allowed to discipline students–that was her realm.  She failed.  The student, who prompted the conversation, dropped out, got a girl pregnant and took a job at McDonald’s.  Although this chain of events cannot be pinned on the vice principal, she did fail to provide the guidance she had promised. The student received no consequences for being disrespectful to me or his classmates.  The vice principal felt this particular student needed a break. Without consequences for bad behavior, students do not learn.

Additionally, parents need to support teachers. Parents need to stop bullying teachers to inflate grades or to weaken academic rigor or discipline. One parent, a university professor, tried to push me into giving her child an A+ as opposed to an A. She had already withdrawn her student from another class for the same reason. The parent brought in all the papers I had graded, only at the end of the semester, and tried to argue every deduction I had ever made.  I stood firm.  At the end of the year, she pushed the principal into allowing a third speaker at graduation, after the valedictorian and salutatorian. She did no favor for her daughter. Grade inflation, intimidation and bullying all are means to a diminished end. As an undergraduate one of my professors, as well as many others in the psychology department,  routinely gave A’s to all students.  I do want to go to a psychologist that was given grades or to have my children instructed by teachers that were.

Next, teachers and students benefit mentoring. For too long, many schools have had a sink or swim mentally. New teachers often have to prove themselves by creating curriculum, lesson plans, discipline methods or all of the above. One of the exemplary schools where I worked, assigned me a mentor my first year.  My mentor shared everything with me from lesson plans to teddy bears.  I did the same for another teacher in subsequent years.  Why should teachers waste time and reinvent the wheel? In the same way, students would benefit from student or teacher mentoring.  Too many students, even in small schools,  get lost in the cracks.  One mega-school where I worked initiated a mentor program after studying successful schools.  One of the methods we implemented was mentoring. Every faculty member, counselor and administrator was assigned two students. We met with our students at least twice a year to check-in.   Small steps, but steps toward making a difference for the one or two children. That would have made a difference for me. When I was in junior high, I was yearning for an adult to step up.  My stepfather was beating up my mother every two week or so in all night sessions.  My grades were dismal.  When I went to the counselor, she sent me back to class. Told me to come back when I stopped bawling.  That ninth grade year affected my GPA and my future. If only she had asked, “What’s going on?” It took all the courage I had to go in the first time. I wasn’t about to go in a second. A caring adult could have made a difference for me.

After having taught in four different states in diverse schools, my experience has taught me that  mainstreaming does not work for most. The high-end and the low-end suffer. Some people feel there is stigma to classes designed for at-risk children.  However, nothing compares to the stigma felt in the regular classroom.  It is in the like-ability classroom, that camaraderie and pride develop.  Furthermore, high-end students are challenged by similar ability students. These students are more stimulated and less resentful at having to pull their classmates along.  Some common classes should be shared.  High ability students model excellence and inspire others.  Special needs students engender diversity and offer their own unique gifts. However, to meet the needs of varying student abilities in a classroom of thirty-five students is impossible or insufficient at best.

Finally,  children need to be read to and to read often, as well as to write.   Children need stability and change. We lose many children beginning with middle school.  Students need more of the homeroom quality of elementary school. Imagine a work experience that demanded employees shift every year or semester to a room with new employees and a new boss.  How much time would be wasted in the learning curve?  Although, some changes need to be made, especially if there is un-resolvable teacher-student conflict. The best model of a school, where I worked, with the greatest success was a K-12 school.  In elementary school, students stayed with their home room teachers for two years.  Furthermore, the school was small enough so that most departments had only two teachers, three I think would provide more choice and less friction.  However, teachers knew their students, worked out conflicts and developed more appropriate tools to assist individual success. Parents need to be more involved with their teenagers, not less.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: